From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
< Talk:.hack | Talk:.hack/
|
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Video games. For more information, visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion. |
|
Stub |
This article has been rated as Stub-Class on the assessment scale. |
Low |
This article is on a subject of Low priority within gaming for inclusion in Wikipedia 1.0. |
CVG To-do:
- Expand: New CVG Articles, Normality, Pac-Man World 2, Operation Flashpoint: Elite, Call of Juarez, Galactic Civilizations II: Dark Avatar, Ford Street Racing, Betrayal at Krondor
- CVG Peer Review: List of F-Zero titles, Kya: Dark Lineage, Wii Remote, Dynasty Warriors 4, The Sims 2, The Legend of Zelda: A Link to the Past, Kirby's Dream Land, Electronic sports, Fire Emblem, Dante (Devil May Cry), The Elder Scrolls IV: Oblivion, Final Fantasy XII, Sonic the Hedgehog (16-bit), Classes in World of Warcraft
- Cleanup: Age of Mythology, Mario Kart: Double Dash!!, Betrayal at Krondor, List of Nintendo trademarks
- Merge:
- Deletions / Essential articles / Magazines
- Assess and Prioritise articles (Log)
|
[edit] Franchise, Subfranchise, Branch, or other?
".hack//G.U. is a multimedia franchise created as a sequel to the .hack franchise."
Personally, I prefer Branch, with Subfranchise in a close second. To me, calling it a Franchise seems incorrect in some way. Everytime I think of it, I think of it as part of the .hack franchise. It even continues the computer/internet naming motif, "G.U. in / of .hack". You wouldn't know that .hack//Roots and .hack//CELL were part of .hack//G.U. just by looking at their names, but you can reasonably guess they are part of the overall franchise.
What term do you all think .hack//G.U. should be classified as? Mark4011 03:12, 7 April 2006 (UTC)
- hmmm....i kinda like 'Branch' more. 'subfranchise' sounds like a fast food chain. OmniAngel 12:12, 7 April 2006 (UTC)